Say you’re aguy who reads WIRED—you know a thing or two aboutartificial intelligence. You recognize the names of well-known people developing AI, like OpenAI CEOSam Altman. But do you know who Mira Murati is? What about Susan Milner? Craig Dalton?
In a new survey of more than 5,400 Americans, 73 percent of male respondents told Harvard researchers they knew who Altman was. A little over half—53 percent—said they knew of Murati, Milner, and Dalton.
There’s one problem. Murati is a real person: she’sthe former CTO of OpenAI and the current CEO of Thinking Machine Labs.Milner and Dalton, on the other hand, do not exist.
Compared towomen, “we're seeing that men are more optimistic and more confident” across the board when it comes to AI, Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center executive director Laura Manley tells WIRED. Sometimes, that veers into overconfidence—like claiming to recognize fictional AI executives. (For context, 40 percent of women claimed to know who Milner and Dalton were; 38 percent said they recognized Murati.)
While Manley notes that men are more overconfident in general when surveyed, the report, published on Wednesday, digs into what the confidence gap on AI looks like, as well as the repercussions of gendered divides.
Researchers found that men use AI more frequently and are, on average, better able to correctly answer factual questions about AI. But men and women answer questionsincorrectlyat around the same rate. The discrepancy is based on how often women said they weren’t sure of an answer—an average of 3.3 questions out of 12 compared to 2.3 questions for men.
Researchers wondered if this predilection toward certainty colors coverage of AI. Across a year of media coverage, men were named in headlines about AI more than 14 times as often as women. Because top AI executives skew heavily male, researchers decided to reexamine coverage, looking solely at people who were quoted as subject experts. Three-quarters of these experts were men—a higher proportion than the actual AI talent pool, which isroughly 29 percent women.
“Maybe there should be more women prominently featured as experts or given the platform to express: not sure,” Manley says.
Besides intellectual bluster, Americans were generally in agreement that AI was freaking them out—men and women both rated “concern” as their top emotional response. However, female respondents were more concerned, fearful, and worried than their male counterparts. Men, meanwhile, rated every positive feeling—including curiosity, enthusiasm, and excitement—higher than women did.
In the current discourse, “there's so much confidence in either doom or abundance,” Manley says. “It just drowns out all of the voices that should be saying ‘not sure.’” There are many unanswered questions on proper uses for and the future of AI. One gender is simply less likely to acknowledge such uncertainty.
“We have to be able to be able to say ‘not sure’ more often,” Manley says.
Comments
Back to topComments
Back to topYou Might Also Like
Introducing the app:More ways tomake the most of WIRED
Meta failed to catch hundreds ofAI child abuse ads
Big Story:The search forSilicon Valley’s most powerful woman
Hackers gotinside a Flock camera—its data shows how the system really works
In your inbox:Go inside the world of digital security withKernel Panic
is a senior writer at WIRED, covering the future of work. Previously, she was a senior correspondent at Business Insider and served as an executive producer of the Emmy-nominated docuseries
Quiet on Set: The Dark Side of Kids TV. She earned her MBA at Columbia Business School and ...
Read MoreSenior Writer
Topics
Sam AltmanOpenAIartificial intelligencegenderresearchWe Surveyed 634 Women Who Work in Tech. They Let LooseExecutives happily automating their days with AI. New hires confronting bro culture. Women in tech have a lot to say—and they told it all to WIRED.
Sandra Upson
We Surveyed 634 Women Who Work in Tech. They Let LooseExecutives happily automating their days with AI. New hires confronting bro culture. Women in tech have a lot to say—and they told it all to WIRED.
Sandra Upson
The Search for Silicon Valley’s Most Powerful WomanWomen hold some of the most consequential jobs in tech, but they’re still not cult figures. WIRED investigates why.
Lauren Goode
Trump’s Crazy AI Rebrand Was a Loyalty Test for Tech Execs—and It WorkedFor years these billionaires gushed obsessively about AI. But they meekly went along when Trump canceled the term.
Steven Levy
AI Agents Are About to Flood the Workforce. No One’s Ready for ItYour next coworker might well be an AI agent—and will require a whole new model of workplace interactions.
Kate Taylor
Women Still Face Too Much Bullshit—in Silicon Valley and BeyondWIRED dedicating an entire issue to women in 2026 might seem regressive, or obvious, or even unnecessary. We disagree.
Katie Drummond
If the AI Industry Followed Its Own Research, It Might Have Paused AlreadyAnthropic’s CEO says that safety hinges on understanding how AI “thinks.” So far the evidence is disturbing.
Steven Levy
Why No One Wants to Date Tech BrosOnce seen as nerdy but harmless innovators, men in tech are now widely regarded as red-pilled Elon Musk wannabes. It’s made getting laid a whole lot harder.
Elana Klein
Book Publishers Are Quietly Using More AI. Staff Are RevoltingWorkers at three major publishing houses tell WIRED that LLMs are being used for publicity, cover art, back cover copy, and emails, as some execs push junior staff to champion the tech.
Adam Morgan
Inside the Muslim Manosphere Policing Women OnlineFrom Red Pill coaches to “Dawah Bros,” influencers are dressing up hypermasculinity and misogyny in religious language—and finding audiences across social platforms.
Maysaa Ajjan
Justice for CSSIn defense of the girliest programming language.
Pete Millspaugh
Timnit Gebru Believes There Is No ‘Existential Threat’ From AIOne of AI’s fiercest critics believes the doom talk is about founders making money, not saving humanity.
Lauren Goode
